Weight Watchers meals are all over the internet! Just one search and you'll get almost everything that you need from cookies, frozen meals to recipes and cookbooks. It could be a frantic search for a person does Weight Watchers but do they really work? Let us take a look at these meals closely.
Cooks.com caters resources for different recipes of Weight Watchers meals. It's indeed delectable to find pies, meat loaf, cookies, snickers and brownies on this site. Most of the steps are easy to follow and the ingredients are too easy to purchase. However, if you're going to browse each of them to look closely at the ingredients especially those of the Weight Watchers, some are actually surprisingly of high Glycemic Index (GI) like Grapenuts. They're actually carbohydrates that generate high fluctuations in our insulin levels and blood glucose. Thereby, it gives higher risks for heart disease and diabetes. It's not just an issue of whether these Weight Watchers meals work, after then it becomes more on the issue of health.
Another example's the Weight Watchers cookies. It contains brown sugar and carob chips. According to Calorie King, the plain carob contains 5 cal per gram or 153 cal per ounce. It also contains 8.9 grams of fat for every ounce and nearly 15 grams of sugar. Carob they say, have more sugar than chocolate. Natural brown sugar on the other hand contains 11 calories per 4 grams or 1 teaspoon. Compared to white sugar, brown sugar may be considered healthier but with 11 calories per 4 grams, this ingredient's not to be considered a good meal for a person who wants to avoid diabetes. It's indeed interesting how Weight Watchers meals try to substitute the most favored delicacies like chocolate. However, while looking closely at their substitutes it seems unbelievably convincing that they are healthy. Just consider the 8.9 grams of fats from carob chips - how's that for a diet food?
Weight Watchers meals are always accompanied by calculators and nutrient database. Even USDA knows that such nutrient databases is standard but are simply close estimates of the specific values. It's relative to the estimates of ones walk going to their neighbor's house. Apparently, mathematics and physics could always defend that good solutions come from estimated variables, but that's if all the other factors have specific values. In the Weight Watchers meals, all the computed fats, calories and sugar are simply estimates and from these estimated values are Weight Watchers meal references. Thus, it doesn't sound substantial. From estimates you beget estimates and they consider them good bases for their meals. Isn't that stupendous?
If one's to consider of its viability to be 100% healthy, chances are it isn't. While, if one is to consider if they give you the exact amount of fats, calories and sugar for every meal, the situation is improbable. Since, the question has been answered, try switching course. The "11 pounds for 9 days" is a good offer from Fat Loss for Idiots.
0 comments:
Post a Comment